In 2014, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued an enforcement memo addressing how Tribes can fit into marijuana legalization. Though that memo neither legalizes marijuana for Tribes nor makes any changes to federal drug laws, it states that Tribes will essentially be given a pass, like states, to legalize marijuana in accordance with current DOJ marijuana enforcement priorities.

Why then have so many Tribal marijuana experiments been met with DOJ resistance? Is the DOJ treating Tribes more harshly than it treats the states? Or is it that so many Tribes have failed to comply with the tenets of the federal tribal marijuana memo?  It’s some of both.

The DOJ tribal memo provides as follows:

“Indian Country includes numerous reservations and tribal lands with diverse sovereign governments, many of which traverse state borders and federal districts. Given this, the United States Attorneys recognize that effective federal law enforcement in Indian Country, including marijuana enforcement, requires consultation with our tribal partners in the districts and flexibility to confront the particular, yet sometimes divergent, public safety issues that can exist on any single reservation.

“Consistent with the Attorney General’s 2010 Indian Country Initiative, in evaluating marijuana enforcement activities in Indian Country, each United States Attorney should consult with the affected tribes on a government-to-government basis.”

This memo sounds like the DOJ is open to working with Tribes seeking to legalize marijuana by following the eight enforcement priorities set out in the 2013 Cole Memo. In other words, so long as a Tribe first consults with the appropriate U.S. attorneys regarding its plans for legalization or decriminalization and so long as that Tribe’s plans include the “robust regulations” required by the Cole Memo, one ought to be able to assume that the DOJ would allow that Tribe to legalize, just as so many states have done with both recreational and medical marijuana.But that has not happened in the real world.

First, there was the Pit River raid in July of this year. In that case, federal government authorities, including the DEA and special agents with the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), raided cannabis cultivation operations on the Alturas Indian Rancheria and the XL Ranch in Modoc County, California. According to U.S. Attorney press-release, “[t]he search warrants are part of an ongoing investigation relating to the financing and management of the commercial marijuana-cultivation projects.” In a U.S. Attorney affidavit we can see what went into the raid itself.

Tribal Marijuana in AmericaSo, why the raid? California’s existing cannabis regulations are not “robust” and therefore do not meet the standards of the Cole Memo, and the DOJ probably believed these Tribal cannabis operations were simply “too big” for the DOJ to ignore. Most importantly, it appears as though the Tribe never received the required U.S. Attorney approval for its operations. There also appears to have been questionable non-Native American financiers involved with the Tribal grows, which is probably yet another reason why the DOJ believed it could not just sit back. Lastly, proposed traceability and accountability of the Tribe’s plants and products also did not appear to meet DOJ enforcement priorities for a grow of this large size.

Second, there was, in late October of this year, the federal government raid of a grow belonging to the Menominee Tribe in Wisconsin, wherein the government seized some 30,000 cannabis plants. This grow was allegedly made up of only industrial hemp and not marijuana plants capable of producing active THC. Menominee Tribal leaders maintain that “. . . the plants were intended for lawful research into growing industrial hemp, which is processed and utilized for fiber, food and oil and is distinguishable from marijuana by its lower levels of the high-inducing compound tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).” Though federal law prohibits cultivating hemp without a DEA permit, the Menominee were cultivating their hemp in cooperation with the College of the Menominee Nation, in line with the federal Farm Bill of 2014.

The twist with the Menominee raid is that, unlike the Pit River raid, the Menominee Tribe was engaged in active and reciprocal dialogue with BIA, the local cops, and an assistant U.S. attorney. These law enforcement authorities were aware of the Menominee’s hemp-growing plans and presumably had not taken issue with those plans until a BIA employee and local police inspected the operation and took plant samples. The affidavit in this raid states that, in addition to witnessing “individuals appearing to be non-native” and a Colorado-based consultant aiding the Tribe, the plant samples tested positive for the “presumptive indication” of marijuana.

Third, and just last week, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota made headlines by legalizing marijuana with big plans to develop a medical marijuana-friendly resort on its lands and then suspending its growing operations and burning its entire crop, citing concerns about criminal prosecution if it didn’t. Apparently, state and federal officials reviewed the Tribe’s business plans and determined that “. . . any changes in tribal law would only affect tribal members, therefore, non-tribal members ingesting marijuana on the reservation risked prosecution under state law. . . [a]lso according to state officials, any non-tribal member returning to state land with marijuana in their system were violating state law, and thus, also subject to prosecution.” South Dakota Attorney General Mart Jackley told the media that the Tribe’s decision to suspend its cannabis project was “in the best interest of both tribal and non-tribal members,” but also promised to help the Tribe move forward with alternative cannabis plans. The Tribe is saying that, next time, it will use a more “calculated approach” to cannabis.

What are the takeaways from these three raids? First off, the Tribes must do their utmost to coordinate (in advance) their cannabis plans with any and all relevant local, state, and federal officials. Second, their cannabis regime must closely hew the line with the various federal memos on what constitutes the sort of cannabis regime required for the Feds to keep their hands off. Third, the Tribes should do what they can to minimize direct involvement by non-Tribal members, especially those who are not Native-Americans and especially those with questionable (criminal) pasts. Our opinion is that Tribes that closely abide by these three things will fare far better than those who do not, and there are a number of Tribes out there working on doing exactly that.

At this point, we preach patience.

  • DC

    I do agree that the Cole Memo does have “robust regulations”.
    But I hope the Tribes learned valuable lessons from their trials and errors. Another
    great post indeed!

  • You hope the tribes learned valuable lessons….wtf? Farmers in co have tested hot for acers and acers of hemp as well as hot hemp growers in ky with zero interference by the feds. Whats is happening with the tribes is a pure shame and any american should be horrifed and find it 100% unacceptable that feds r interfering on trible land especially over cannabis. If i can grow marijuana hemp in colorado then they sure in the hell should be able to do it on Trible land with no interference. Totally unfair and unjust.

    • Ray

      I agree…the government recognized that tribes are sovereign nations, with rights similar to states. However, it seems it may be easier to operate a grow or dispensary in certain states as opposed to tribal lands, which is unfair.

  • Sophia Marx

    I say this is total BS – not the article, but the behavior of government officials. It is forced segregation if the tribes want a chance to grow a cash crop. Hemp is a needed cash crop in this country for ALL its benefits. Use the original Cannabis, not the altered varieties that are used strictly for smoking. The only thing learned here is that the federal government is still trying to regulate the ability to become self sufficient out of the People. They still prefer them to be dependent on federal handouts through 3rd parties to keep full control.